Zambia: Two Jailed for Five Years for Illegal Ivory Possession, Two Fined for Illegal Timber Possession

Author: lusakatimes.comPublished on: October 29, 2026Country: Zambia
Crime & LawEnvironment & Climate
Zambia: Two Jailed for Five Years for Illegal Ivory Possession, Two Fined for Illegal Timber Possession

The headline reports that two people in Zambia were sentenced to five years in prison for illegal ivory possession. Two others were fined for illegal timber possession. The provided text gives no names, locations or details about the fine amounts.

Stay informed with NewsBoulevard

Get the latest news summaries delivered to your inbox

Related News

SANTACO calls for end to Western Cape taxi violence after CATA skips talks
Crime & LawSociety & LifestyleSouth Africa
iol.co.za•

SANTACO calls for end to Western Cape taxi violence after CATA skips talks

SANTACO has called for an end to deadly taxi violence in the Western Cape and urged drivers to return to work after CATA representatives failed to attend talks with CODETA and the provincial government. The Thursday, October 29 meeting was intended to resolve the dispute amid shootings allegedly linked to tensions between the associations; police confirmed that 10 people had been shot in recent days. Makhosandile Tumana, SANTACO’s Western Cape spokesperson, said talks had been rescheduled for Monday and CODETA members were expected to help protect drivers. He appealed to taxi operators to stop the killings, saying drivers and commuters were bearing the brunt of the dispute.

Read More
High Court Rejects Ruto’s Plan to Reserve Affordable Houses for Teachers and Police
Crime & LawPoliticsKenya
Timothy Cerullo•

High Court Rejects Ruto’s Plan to Reserve Affordable Houses for Teachers and Police

Kenya’s High Court declared unconstitutional and legally ineffective President William Ruto’s announcements to reserve 20% of affordable housing units for teachers and police officers. In a ruling delivered on October 29, Justice Patricia Nyaundi said the president could not change allocation criteria established by law and regulations without a statutory or policy basis. The decision followed a constitutional petition arguing that the reservation would unfairly favour selected groups, despite the programme drawing on public resources and contributions from Kenyans in different occupations. Petitioners’ lawyer John Maina said the proposed allocation was unsupported by any existing law.

Read More

Stay Updated with NewsBoulevard

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news summaries delivered to your inbox